Are fraud and misrepresentation claims the best way to enforce doctor choice for injured workers?

Posted on by

A case out of Texas may provide injured workers to a way to enforce their state’s doctor choice laws.  In Warneke v. Nabors Drilling USA, a Texas appellate court held that a workers’ fraud and misrepresentation case against his employer for lying about having workers compensation coverage was not barred by the exclusive remedy of the workers compensation statute because the fraud was separate from the work injury.

A workers compensation doctor choice fraud and misrepresentation claim would be difficult to prosecute, but as a fellow trial lawyer told me at a recent AAJ membership and PAC drive, if things were easy people wouldn’t need lawyers.

In Warneke, the employer lied when it told their injured employee that they did not have workers compensation insurance. The court said the fraud caused the plaintiff to incur unpaid medical bills as well as emotional damages from economic distress.

Fraud and misrepresentation in regards to doctor choice could be proved to showing that the employer and/or insurer knew that an injured worker could chose their own doctor yet told the worker they could not see their own doctor. Damages in a doctor choice fraud case could be pain for working while the worker should have been on light duty and/or off work. A fraud claim could also be paired with a constructive discharge claim if working while an injured workers should have been convalescing caused an injured worker to quit.

A doctor choice fraud case poses many challenges. First of all it would likely require a medical doctor to examine an injured worker and to review the records of the employer-chosen doctor to see if the treatment was appropriate. That would be a major expense. Secondly, should such a case get to a jury there is the ingrained bias that workers compensation fraud is usually committed by workers trying to “milk the system.”

A workers compensation doctor choice fraud and misrepresentation claim would be difficult to prosecute, but as a fellow trial lawyer told me at a recent AAJ membership and PAC drive, if things were easy people wouldn’t need lawyers.

The offices of Rehm, Bennett & Moore, which also sponsors the Trucker Lawyers website, are located in Lincoln and Omaha, Nebraska. Five attorneys represent plaintiffs in workers’ compensation, personal injury, employment and Social Security disability claims. The firm’s lawyers have combined experience of more than 95 years of practice representing injured workers and truck drivers in Nebraska, Iowa and other states with Nebraska and Iowa jurisdiction. The lawyers regularly represent hurt truck drivers and often sue Crete Carrier Corporation, K&B Trucking, Werner Enterprises, UPS, and FedEx. Lawyers in the firm hold licenses in Nebraska and Iowa and are active in groups such as the College of Workers’ Compensation Lawyers, Workers' Injury Law & Advocacy Group (WILG), American Association for Justice (AAJ), the Nebraska Association of Trial Attorneys (NATA), and the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA). We have the knowledge, experience and toughness to win rightful compensation for people who have been injured or mistreated.

This entry was posted in Doctor, Fraud, Misrepresentation and tagged , , .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *